Job Security

What the company proposes:

 

  • to remove provisions that now allow employees to return to their job if a transfer or promotion doesn't work out and that allow employees to decline transfers without repercussions to their future with the paper
  • to be able to hire more people with less than one year of experience in the editorial, circulation, classified and accounting departments
  • to reduce severance to 12 weeks of pay, from 38, and provide it only to people who are laid off (Severance is already denied to anyone terminated for proven dishonesty or who provokes their own termination in order to get a severance check.)
  • to make it so subjective standards - "job performance, contributions to the company, the ability to do the remaining work" - can be taken into account when there are layoffs, in addition to seniority
  • to be able to remove union work in a way that would cause maintenance and systems employees to be laid off
  • to remove required preferences for internal applicants when hiring
  • to be able to make full-time positions part-time without Guild agreement
  • to eliminate newsroom team leaders from Guild coverage, which would take away their contractual protections
  • to exclude from union membership people who work for online and niche publications
  • to be able to require reporters and photographers to do each other’s work
  • to be able to make it a requirement that employees own cars
  • to be able to test employees for drug use
  • to be able to hire freelancers to write for any section of the newspaper

Concerns expressed so far with company proposal:

 

  • The combination of looser freelance hiring, discretionary and less costly layoffs and a lower required minimum for future hires could effectively put higher-paid employees at risk of termination, given that they could be replaced with freelancers or a cheaper new hire.
  • Subjective layoff standards are exactly that - subjective. Seniority is objective.
  • Having to pay higher severance may discourage the company from laying people off; lower severance may make it an easier choice to cut staff instead of looking harder at other ways to reduce costs.

What the Guild proposes:

 

  • to provide a longer and specific notice to people who could be affected by a reduction in force
  • to discuss a new standard for when the company conducts layoffs
  • to increase maximum severance, to 52 weeks
  • to discuss how audio and video apply to the reporter-photographer provision
July 12, 2007